Sunday, October 30, 2022

Circus of Horrors

 

Circus of Horrors Poster

(1960) Directed by Sidney Hayers; Written by George Baxt; Starring: Anton Diffring, Erika Remberg, Yvonne Monlaur, Donald Pleasence, Jane Hylton, Kenneth Griffith and Yvonne Romain; Available on Blu-ray and DVD. 

Rating: ***½ 

This post is part of the Devilishly Delightful DonaldPleasence Blogathon, hosted by Gill Jacob from Realweegiemidget Reviews and Yours Truly. Be sure to check out all the terrific posts, covering a wide range of films/TV appearances from his expansive career.

Schuler, Nicole, and Angela

Martin (Kenneth Griffith): “Thieves, murderers?”

Dr. Rossiter/Schüler (Anton Diffring): “Yes. Well, don’t you see? These are the people who will constitute our circus troupe. I change their faces, minimize the police apprehension. Willing subjects for my anxious hands. We hold their safety and they hold their tongue. It’s the ideal front.”

What is it about the circus that makes it such a fertile ground for tales of horror and suspense? Look no further than Tod Browning’s forays into the big top and sideshows (The Show, The Unknown, Freaks), which exploit the more lurid aspects of that colorful milieu. If nothing else, the movies have taught us that the circus is a haven for shady individuals with questionable histories and motives, on the run from the law. Director Sidney Hayers and writer George Baxt’s depiction of a circus from hell is considered the second title in a rough trilogy of films from Anglo-Amalgamated,* starting with Horrors of the Black Museum (1959) and ending with Peeping Tom (1960).  Filmed in England, Circus of Horrors incorporated footage of a real, working performance troupe, Billy Smart’s Circus.** 

* Fun Fact #1: Circus of Horrors could easily be confused for a Hammer Films production, considering the fact that Anton Diffring, Yvonne Monlaur, and Yvonne Romain all appeared in movies from Anglo-Amalgamated’s competitor. 

** Fun Fact #2: Note the circus banners emblazoned with “BS” (No, not that kind of BS) for Billy Smart, which conveniently stand in for Bernard Schüler’s circus.

Martin, Angela, and Rossiter/Schuler

The story begins in 1947, with Dr. Rossiter fleeing the UK after a botched attempt at plastic surgery. Along with his accomplices, surgeon Angela and her brother Martin (Jane Hylton and Kenneth Griffith), he makes his way to the French countryside, where he adopts the name Bernard Schüler. He encounters Vanet, a down-on-his-luck circus owner circus, played by Donald Pleasence (in a small but pivotal role). Vanet’s daughter Nicole’s (Carla Challoner) face is scarred from a wartime schoolyard bombing (“There are many like me now.”), which Schüler promises to restore, for a price. After Vanet’s “accidental” death, Schüler takes on the role of Nicole’s uncle, while vowing to turn the threadbare circus into something noteworthy (“It’ll be the ideal front.”). In a move that would make any self-respecting human resources professional cringe, he combs the seedy underbelly of various European towns, searching for women with shady backgrounds and facial flaws. Once they’re a part of the circus, he fixes their appearance, and keeps detailed dossiers on them, so they won’t blab to the authorities. Any attempts to defy Schüler by leaving result in their immediate peril. Flash-forward a decade, and Schüler’s circus is a big success despite a series of questionable incidents (It comes to be known as the “Jinx Circus.” A Berlin police inspector (Peter Swanwick)* is wise to Schüler’s subterfuge, but without proof of any foul play, he’s forced to let him go. Of course, that doesn’t stop him from tipping off the British authorities, including Scotland Yard inspector Arthur Ames (Conrad Phillips), posing as a reporter. 

* Fun Fact #3: If the “German” police inspector looks familiar, it’s no coincidence. The British actor is probably best known for his role as the inscrutable Supervisor in the landmark television series, The Prisoner (1967).

Vanet

Pleasence, sporting an attempted French accent (and hair!), makes an impression as the depressive alcoholic Vanet. The only thing of value he has left is his beloved daughter, Nicole (“The war has left nothing but ruin and poverty”). He unwisely promises Rossiter/Schüler “anything and everything” if he will repair his daughter’s face. Although the operation is a success, it proves to be a Faustian bargain. In an alcohol-fueled moment of poor judgment, he antagonizes Bosco the dancing bear, getting too close to the enraged animal (okay, a guy in a not-very-convincing bear suit). The ensuing attack sequence looks more like a bear rug was draped over him, but it’s a testament to Pleasence’s skill and professionalism that he convincingly sells his violent death. The one person who doesn’t suspect any wrongdoing is the adult Nicole (Yvonne Monlaur), who only thinks of Schüler as her uncle.

Schüler discovers Elissa

Diffring paints a portrait of the perfect egomaniac, shamelessly manipulative, amoral and vain. He wields a riding crop that he inflicts on animals and humans alike, to submit them to his will. Much like Dr. Frankenstein,* he believes the means justify the ends. The performers he helps are nothing more than raw material for practicing his craft. Of all the people he manipulates, none are as pitiable as Angela, his assisting surgeon, who carries an unrequited torch for him. Schüler uses her love for him as leverage, stringing her along with declarations such as, “You are very necessary to me” (Not exactly a declaration of affection). To him, she’s little more than another surgical instrument that can help him attain his goal. He hopes to re-emerge from hiding to boast about his revolutionary medical discoveries (“I have unlocked the secrets of plastic surgery that will stagger the world.”). In the meantime, however, he has a circus to run, and doesn’t appreciate dissent or attrition among the ranks. He sits back and lets someone else do the dirty work (usually Angela’s brother Martin). Schüler is a character you love to hate – never for a moment do you want to see him get away with murder. Despite his abhorrent nature, one thing that keeps him from being a two-dimensional villain is that he genuinely cares for Nicole, while attempting to shelter her from his evil actions.   

* Fun Fact #4: Diffring starred as Baron Frankenstein in the failed 1958 Hammer TV pilot Tales of Frankenstein.

A Knife Act Gone Bad

Circus of Horrors keeps its audience on edge throughout with a series of bloody events orchestrated by the sociopathic main character.* Considering that World War II and its associated horrors had only ended 15 years before the movie debuted, the atrocities of Nazi* surgeons such as Mengele would have been embedded in the public’s consciousness. Everything about the film is slightly off-kilter, adding to the viewer’s unease. The inclusion of the song, “Look for a Star”** is more disconcerting than soothing (Like it? Great. Don’t like it? Too bad. It’s featured in the movie five times). Similarly, the troupe of clowns*** emerge as a mute Greek chorus, underscoring Sculer’s misdeeds. 

* Not-So-Fun Fact: Although frequently typecast as a Nazi (and Nazi-like characters) in numerous productions, Anton Diffring’s film roles couldn’t be further from the truth. Diffring had fled Nazi Germany to avoid persecution because he was gay and his father was Jewish. 

** Fun Fact #5: The hit song was written by Mark Anthony, a pseudonym for Tony Hatch, probably best known today for penning the Petula Clark song, “Downtown.” 

*** Fun Fact #6: Watch for Kenny (“R2D2”) Baker in an uncredited appearance, as one of the clowns.

Schüler's First Patient

One of the plot conveniences is that characters who are otherwise so street smart foolishly telegraph their intentions to leave (Why don’t they just sneak out in the middle of the night?) or blackmail the doctor. After his top star Magda (Vanda Hudson) dies in a knife act gone awry, with a little help from Schüler’s toady, Martin, high wire performer Elissa (Erika Remberg) insists that she have top billing in the show (Three guesses about how well that goes, and the first two don’t count). Also, considering the reputation of the “Jinx Circus,” it stretches believability why anyone would want to join in the first place (free plastic surgery or not). While perhaps a notch below in quality compared to some of its more notable contemporaries (Psycho, Peeping Tom, and Eyes Without a Face), Circus of Horrors is unabashedly ghoulish fun.

 

Sources for this article: “Back to the Circus: An Interview with Kim Newman” (2020), “Interview with Broadcaster Stuart Maconie” (2020).

20 comments:

  1. Love this one, a better film than Circus of Blood with Joan Crawford but with a similar feel. Need to see again. Perfect Pleasance film to feature at Halloween time, great article! Thanks again for cohosting this fabulous blogathon and Happy Halloween!
    - Chris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much, Chris! I had a blast with Circus of Horrors. Now I need to seek out Circus of Blood, just for comparison's sake. Happy Halloween! :)

      Delete
  2. Love this one, a better film than Circus of Blood with Joan Crawford (which I also like) but with a similar feel. Need to see again. Perfect Pleasance film to feature at Halloween time, great article! Thanks again for cohosting this fabulous blogathon and Happy Halloween!
    - Chris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you again, and thanks for taking part in the blogathon! :)

      Delete
  3. I do love it when Pleasence attempts an accent, if you check out his horror with Jennifer Connelly in Phenomena, he has a "Scottish" accent in this Italian movie. Which is the no1 reason to run the No True Scotsman blogathon again... or this one. Just discovered this is streaming over here so will be back to comment on this movie later!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Gill! I think you'd really like this one, so I'm anxious to hear your thoughts about it. Enjoy. Hmm... Pleasence with a Scottish accent? I need to hear that. Thanks again for being the perfect co-host!

      Delete
  4. Another new one for me, and with your review, I am adding to my watchlist. Pleasance looks downright happy in that picture!

    🎃👻🦇 Happy Halloween! 🎃👻🦇

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's highly recommended. I hope you like it! And yes, he's happy because he doesn't know what's about to happen to him in the next scene! ;)

      Happy Halloween!

      Delete
  5. Wonderful review Barry! The first time I tried to watch Circus of Horrors, I didn't get past the first scene where the botched plastic surgery is revealed (I was about 10) - and I didn't get much sleep that night. Eventually I was able to get through the whole thing, and it is a lot of fun in a nasty sort of way. I had forgotten the scene where Pleasence/Vanet is killed by the bear. Of all the ways to die in a circus, why pick one of the hardest things to film effectively, and try to make do with a bear costume? :-) Diffring was always the ice man as far as movie villainy goes. It's ironic that he had to flee for his life from the Nazis, only to play them later on in the movies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much, Brian! I could only what kind of impact that first scene would have on a young kid. I have some similar stories about things I watched in the '70s. ;) Diffring's career is proof that life plays some cruel tricks on people. I guess he figured it was a paycheck. Thanks for stopping by!

      Delete
  6. Intriguing review, barry!
    I have not seen circus of horrors but it sounds like one that needs to be on my list.
    Though I am terrified at the prospect of hearing that song five times even though I don't think I've heard it before! 😅

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, once you hear it, it'll be stuck in your head forever, and ever, and ever... ;) But don't let that dissuade you from seeking it out. It's good morbid fun!

      Delete
  7. Good review, Barry. I watched this a year ago almost to the day. Not a bad film but I found it got a little repetitive once the circus became successful (cross Schüler, suffer a circus related accident, repeat). I also found that, like The Man Who Could Cheat Death, Diffring in a lead role is a little problematic. He is so good at the cold, arrogant parts that you feel no affinity to him at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Michael. Strangely enough, I though Diffring worked better in this role, compared to The Man Who Could Cheat Death. Perhaps, because his character in Circus of Horrors was so unabashedly irredeemable. I had fun with it for what it was, but I agree the deaths are a bit "lather, rinse repeat."

      Delete
  8. Excellent review! Nice choice of snapshots. I just added it to my watch list. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! :) It's well worth seeking out. Enjoy!

      Delete
  9. I can't imagine Donald Pleasance doing a French accent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not terribly convincing, but he tries. :)

      Delete
  10. Hi Barry! I'm trying to get the hang of commenting here instead of on Twitter, which I suppose is burning to the ground nowadays.
    This is such a fun review! I remember buying a cheap DVD of this movie years ago. I'm a sucker for a horror movie about a circus or carnival so this is right up my alley. This one is just good trashy fun and that's all you need sometimes. Really enjoyed reading your review of this film.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Amber! I have a soft spot for this movie, so I couldn't wait to write about it. I'm with you on circus and carnival horror. :)

      And yeah, Twitter was always a garbage fire, but it's grown especially garbage-y lately. Glad to finally have a presence on another platform.

      Delete