(1977) Directed by William Friedkin; Written by Walon Green; Based on the novel The Wages of Fear, by Georges Arnaud; Starring: Roy Scheider, Bruno Cremer, Francisco Rabal, Amidou, Ramon Bieri, Peter Capell, Karl John and Friedrich von Ledebur; Available on Blu-ray and DVD
Rating: *****
This post is part of the Adventure-a-Thon, hosted by Gill Jacob from Realweegiemidget Reviews and Yours Truly. Be sure to check out all the terrific posts from a talented bunch of bloggers.
“…the story, to me, was about the mystery of fate, the role that fate plays in the lives of all of us. And I had made a film, in The Exorcist, about the mystery of faith, and I now wanted to make a film that had no supernatural element to it, but was about the mystery of fate – the fact somebody can walk across the street, feeling in the peak of health, and get hit by a car, that we have no control over our destinies…” – William Friedkin (from 2015 interview with Nicolas Winding Refn)
“We're carrying three cases each. One is enough to blow out your fire, six cases will blow out the whole field. That means you don't think all the trucks will make it, one of us is a backup.” – Jackie Scanlon (Roy Scheider)
Henri-Georges Clouzot’s landmark 1953 French film The Wages of Fear (based on the novel by Georges Arnaud), explored the timeless universal theme of desperate men taking desperate measures to achieve a common goal. Filmmaker William Friedkin, hot off two massive Hollywood hits, The French Connection (1972) and The Exorcist (1973), chose the source material as the basis for his follow-up film, Sorcerer.* Co-financed by Universal and Paramount, and filmed in the Dominican Republic and Mexico** from a script by Walon Green (The Wild Bunch), Friedkin and the studios figured they had another hit on their hands. Unfortunately for Friedkin and the studios, instead of knocking it out of the park with another win, Sorcerer died a quick death at the box office,*** failing to connect with audiences or critics. As is the case with so many films covered on this blog, time has vindicated William Friedkin’s intensely human jungle drama, which has only grown in esteem over the years.
* Fun Fact #1: According to Friedkin, he thought of the controversial film title while listening to Miles Davis’ album, “Sorcerer.” In this case, the titular evil wizard was fate itself.
** Not-So-Fun-Fact #1: Aside from the daunting logistics of a location shoot and budget concerns nature took its toll on the crew. Friedkin contracted malaria toward the end of the shoot, and fifty crew members had to leave the production after suffering from gangrene and other maladies.
*** Not-So-Fun Fact #2: After its initial failure at the
box office, Sorcerer was re-edited by its international distributor,
CIC, and re-released under the title The Wages of Fear, ultimately resulting
in a lawsuit by Friedkin to retrieve his original cut.
We’re introduced to the four primary characters through the opening scenes: Nilo (Francisco Rabal), a ruthless assassin in Vera Cruz, Mexico; Victor Manzon (Bruno Cremer), a businessman accused of embezzlement in Paris, France; Kassem (Amidou), a terrorist in Jerusalem; and Jackie Scanlon (Roy Scheider),*/** a wheelman in the botched heist of a cathedral in New Jersey. Now on the run from various authorities, the four men end up, under assumed names, in the sleepy village of Porvenir, in an unspecified South American country, where people go when they want to fall off the face of the Earth (“It’s the kind of place nobody wants to go looking”). “Carlos,” (Friedrich von Ledebur) an escaped Nazi, tends bar in Porvenir, while corrupt police officers lord over the town. The impoverished locals rely on work from a nearby oil well, run by an American company. After a disastrous explosion at the site, resulting in the deaths of several townspeople, the company is eager to resume operations, but in order to do that they need to use dynamite to stop the resulting out-of-control fire. The dynamite in question, due to careless storage practices, is disintegrating, leaking highly volatile nitroglycerin. Although any excessive jostling or movement will set it off, it must be transported from 200 miles away, through uneven roads winding through dense jungle. Attempting to transport the dynamite is tantamount to a suicide mission, so the company must find men desperate enough to put their lives out on the line for the promise of a big paycheck. Stuck in the middle of nowhere with no means of leaving and nothing to lose, the four men rise to the challenge in two questionable vehicles (the film’s title refers to the name of one of the ramshackle trucks).
* Fun Fact #2: The script was originally written with Steve McQueen in the lead role of Scanlon. While initially excited by the prospect of doing the film, McQueen ultimately passed on Sorcerer after Friedkin refused to meet his conditions, which included making his wife Ali McGraw executive producer.
** Fun Fact #3: Friedkin’s only casting choice that made
the cut was Moroccan actor Amidou (Kassem/Martinez). Marcello Mastroianni (as
Victor Manzon) and Lino Ventura (as Nilo) backed out of the production.
The always watchable Roy Scheider hits the right notes as Scanlon, a character as far removed from the hero type as could be. As the wheelman on a failed heist and on the run from the mob, he’s done questionable things, but you can’t help but feel sympathy for his predicament. The same goes for his accidental cohorts, who are equally unsavory people, but bound together by a task with improbable odds. As Friedkin pointed out, the disparate characters are a metaphor for the troubled world. Despite their considerable differences, they need to cooperate or die. They are unquestionably antiheroic, yet their humanity shines through, conveying vulnerability, fear, and self-doubt (behind a façade of bravado).
Conflict is the driving force behind Sorcerer, with man against man, man against himself, and man against nature. Friedkin compels us to put ourselves in the shoes of these men, living in a place where life is cheap. We’re right with them, in one jaw-dropping scene after another, as they narrowly escape oblivion. Putting aside their petty disputes and working together towards a common goal is essential if they hope to survive. The much-touted scene where the party is forced to cross a rickety bridge over rushing waters is as tense and harrowing as its reputation suggests. Amidst heavy rain and the treacherous, churning river below, they have no alternative but to cross the swaying bridge, which threatens to collapse at any second.* In a tense scene, when an enormous fallen tree trunk blocks their progress, the team are forced to use their collective ingenuity, along with a case of dynamite, to clear the way. The music by German group Tangerine Dream** propels the action and enhances the tension, contributing to the film’s raw energy.
* Not-So-Fun-Fact #3: While shooting the complicated scene in Tuxtepec, Mexico, four stuntmen were injured in what was then touted as “the most dangerous stunt attempt in film history,” when their 16-ton truck drove off the bridge.
** Fun Fact #4: Tangerine Dream’s haunting, synth-heavy
score was composed and recorded in an abandoned Bavarian church before the film
was made. Friedkin stated that he cut the film to the music.
Sorcerer is the consummate “sweaty palms” movie, with potential calamity looming around every corner, forcing the viewer to put themselves in the place of the characters. While Friedkin expressly stated that he didn’t want supernatural elements in his film, there is an almost unworldly aura surrounding everything, with people battling forces (social, political and elemental) that are entirely beyond their control. Perhaps this could be extended towards the film’s initial negative reception, as well. It’s a case of the right movie at the wrong time, with the wrong title. There are many possible reasons why Sorcerer underperformed upon its release, including a conspicuous lack of traditionally likeable characters, few recognizable names (with the exception of Scheider), and the misfortune of being released around the same time as Star Wars.* But the nail in the coffin was most likely the title, suggesting a fantasy film. All of this aside, the old Hollywood adage that “no one knows anything” still holds true. Even if the stars aligned with the perfect release date, a cast of bankable stars, and perfect title, nothing would have ensured Sorcerer’s success. Fortunately, due to home video and positive word-of-mouth, Sorcerer has enjoyed a major reassessment over the years. With the benefit of hindsight, Sorcerer was way before its time, belatedly establishing its rightful place in cinema history as a true classic
* Fun Fact #5: Reflecting on Sorcerer’s failure at the time, Friedkin commented: “The zeitgeist was changing. It came out a week after Star Wars, and Star Wars really changed the way people think about, ‘What is a movie?’ Right to this day, and beyond. All these films about the Avengers and the Transformers, video games and comic books, that’s what, for the most part, Hollywood cinema has become. That just automatically opened the floodgates to people wanting pure entertainment that could be seen by people of all ages, basically. Would my film have worked if there was no Star Wars? I don’t know. But without “Star Wars,” I think American film would be different today.”
Sources for this article: “William Friedkin in Conversation with Nicolas Winding Refn on Sorcerer” (2015);
“Sorcerer Stunt Attempt Injures Four in Mexico,” Boxoffice, Jan. 24, 1977; “I
thought I was bulletproof: William Friedkin Looks Back at the ‘70s,” New York
Times, April 29, 2013; “Sorcerer Switch,” Screen International, Nov. 19,
1977; “Moxie, Not Magic, Conjured Sorcerer,” by William Friedkin,
Variety, May 10, 2016
Interesting request from Steve McQueen, and those international cast members that could have been... thanks for bringing this underrated Roy Scheider film to the mix Barry. And for your excellent co-host duties.
ReplyDeleteAwww... Thanks for the kind words, Gill. I couldn't imagine hosting this without you! :)
DeleteGreat point about the title working against the movie. It always struck me that there were similarities (both in the story and in the making of the film) between Sorcerer and Fitzcarraldo.
ReplyDeleteThank you! Now that you mention it, that's a great comparison.
DeleteGreat breakdown of a "failed" movie that has steadily grown in reputation over the years! The misleading title surely didn't help, but coming out at the same time as the original Star Wars all but guaranteed the film would fall off a cliff (or a rickety bridge) :) It's sobering on this MaytheFourth to imagine what path Hollywood might have taken if Star Wars hadn't been so wildly successful, but I suspect something else very much like it would have exploded, and we'd be in the same, big budget, big effects comic book world we are now.
ReplyDeleteThanks for checking out my review, Brian. I agree with your comments about Star Wars and the like. Perhaps it was the fate Friedkin spoke of? Then again, I think there's room for "escapist" fare as well, but Friedkin had a point.
DeleteGreat review, Barry!
ReplyDeleteI’ve never heard of Sorcerer, but it sounds intense and entertaining. I seem to be continuously surprised at how difficult it is to peg William Friedkin into a specific genre. I’ve only seen a handful of his films, but I’ve always enjoyed them on various levels, so I definitely need to put Sorcerer on my list!
Thanks so much, John! I can't recommend Sorcerer highly enough. Such a nail-biter from start to finish!
DeleteFor all the behind-the-scenes trouble, as well as the physical shooting challenges, it's too bad this film had bad luck with its release date, and now it seems relatively lesser-known. I've not seen this film, but your review seems to do it justice. Thanks for sharing all that interesting background.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much! It's well worth checking out. I'm just sorry it took so long for me to watch it.
DeleteOhhhh I have never seen this and I immediately added it to my watchlist after reading your post. I love exploring 1970s films. This is right up my alley. Thank you for sharing and hosting such a fun blogathon! xox
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by! Sorcerer is tense from beginning to end, with wonderful performances by all involved. I hope you like it as much as I did! ...I'm glad you enjoyed the blogathon!
DeleteGreat review and fun facts. As much as I love watching Steve McQueen, I think he would’ve been wrong for this film. He’s too cool, too reserved. Scheider has a vulnerability about him that made him great in both Sorcerer and Jaws. Thanks for hosting the blogathon, it's been very enjoyable to be a part of it.
ReplyDeleteThank you! :) I agree that Steve McQueen would have been a bad match for this film. I think you hit the nail on the head about Scheider's vulnerability. There's an "everyman" quality in him that works so well. Thanks for taking part in the blogathon!
DeleteThis film was parodied in the Simpsons episode "Mr Plow" (right down to a little nod to the Tangerine Dream soundtrack) during a scene were Homer has to drive a snowplough across a rope bridge. "Sorcerer" has since enjoyed a major boost in popularity (as one of those "lost masterpieces" from the waning days of New Hollywood), but at the time was still something of an obscurity, so it took me many years to figure out exactly what was being parodied. I happened across a poster for the film and finally put two and two together, then it became a must-see. At the time, it was hard to get hold of a DVD in the UK, so I had to get an imported version (I think from Korea), but totally worth the effort to locate it.
ReplyDeleteI also showed it to my parents several years ago. They both liked it, but I recall they were hung up on the title, which made them anticipate a fantasy/horror.
Wow... It's been ages since I've seen that Simpsons episode (and long before I watched Sorcerer). Now I need to watch it again!
DeleteGreat review! I first saw SORCERER just a few months ago and was blown away, but could tell it was a troubled production, it was no surprise to read your not-so-fun fact about those poor stuntmen. Thank you for co-hosting this blogathon, it's been terrific!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Stacia! ... And thanks again for being a part of this blogathon! :)
DeleteThis looks terrific--great post. I'm a big fan of both Scheider (he is amazing in Marathon Man and All That Jazz, two of my favorites) and Friedkin (Boys in the Band and The Exorcist are among the ones I love best. And thanks for cohosting the blogathon, Barry - so much fun!
ReplyDelete- Chris
Thanks so much! Scheider is great in everything he does. ... And I really need to check out Boys in the Band! So glad you could be a part of this blogathon.
DeleteThis is one of the better remakes. Glad to see someone championing this underrated movie. Sadly, the film bombed, and seriously damaged Friedkin's career. I have always felt that the title was a mistake. For the longest time, I thought it was a horror movie! Anyhow, the movie is brilliantly put together. The acting is fantastic too. And I LOVE Tangerine Dream's weird score! Great review!
ReplyDeleteThank you very much! I agree that the title was a big mistake (and I thought the same thing).
DeleteWilliam Friedkin must have been the first person to realize Roy Scheider could play more than cops (The French Connection, The Seven-Ups, and Chief "You're Gonna Need A Bigger Boat" Brody.
ReplyDelete...And we're all the better for it. Thanks for stopping by!
DeleteI'm with everyone else--Roy Scheider piqued my interest. It's too bad this movie didn't do too well.
ReplyDeleteI guess it just boiled down to being the right movie at the wrong time. Scheider was great, as always. Thanks for stopping by!
Delete