(1981) Directed by Matthew Robbins; Written by Hal Barwood
and Matthew Robbins; Starring: Peter MacNicol, Caitlin Clarke, Ralph
Richardson, John Hallam, Peter Eyre and Ian McDiarmid; Available on DVD
Rating: ***½
“Oh, I know this creature of yours – Vermithrax Pejorative.
Look at these scales, these ridges. When a dragon gets this old, it knows
nothing but pain, constant pain. It grows decrepit, crippled, pitiful,
spiteful.” – Ulrich (Ralph Richardson)
Sword & Sorcery Month begins with a favorite from my
formative years, the Paramount/Disney co-production, Dragonslayer. Don’t let the Disney connection fool you, though.
This early ‘80s PG-rated film contains surprising amounts of gore and a brief flash
of nudity, so if you’re looking for that sort of thing, I’ve got you covered.
The main attractions, however, are the spectacular effects (more on this in a
moment). Dragonslayer was directed and co-written by Matthew Robbins, whose
previous film was Corvette Summer
(1978), and decades later would go on to collaborate with Guillermo del Toro.
Dragonslayer
introduces some fresh faces (circa 1981), including Galen (Peter MacNicol), a
sorcerer’s apprentice, and Valerian (Caitlin Clarke)* a young woman pretending
to be a teenage boy. Valerian appeals to Galen’s master, Ulrich (Ralph
Richardson) to help their village, besieged by a malevolent beast. When Ulrich
suddenly perishes, the apprentice must pick up where the sorcerer left off. His
early demise serves as a reminder that it’s Galen’s story. Richardson portrays
Ulrich not as an all-powerful wizard but a flawed, world-weary man who’s seen a
few too many seasons. His humor and grace contrasts Galen’s awkward, ersatz
cockiness.
* Fun Fact #1: This film marks the first feature roles for
MacNicol and Clarke.
The story’s true villain is mendacious, unprincipled King
Casiodorus Rex (Peter Eyre), who has negotiated an uneasy peace with a
murderous dragon, at the expense of the villagers’ virgin daughters (How anyone
negotiated with a dragon in the first place is anyone’s guess). The kingdom
maintains a lottery, created by Casiodorus, in which said virgins are offered
for sacrifice. And while we’re on the subject of sacrifice, why virgins? If the
villagers offered a non-virgin, would it give the dragon indigestion? We’re
reminded that wealth has its privileges, as Casiodorus keeps his daughter out
of the lottery. His fear of the dragon overwhelms his hatred, and he bristles
at the prospect of anyone tampering with the balance of power. In one scene,
the king tells Galen about an incident, long ago, when his brother set out to
do battle with the dragon, only to vanish without a trace. The only lesson he
seems to have learned is that being noble and brave doesn’t get you very far in
life.
Our hero is plucky and exuberant enough, albeit a bit on the
scrawny side, compared to his contemporaries. As my youngest kid pointed out, “he
looks like he’d be stuffed in a locker.” Of course, Galen’s depiction follows one
of the familiar fantasy tropes, in which our protagonist typically goes one of
two ways: either a hulking hero (e.g., Conan) or a diminutive protagonist, who
favors his wits above brawn. There’s no middle ground. Setting up Galen as the
nominal hero, however, is a missed opportunity to let Valerian shine. It’s disappointing
that once her secret’s out, she takes a back seat to Galen. No offense intended
to MacNicol or his character, but Galen is kind of vanilla in comparison.
Valerian’s subterfuge adds another dimension to her character, which leaves
more questions. Her father successfully avoided the lottery for years by passing
his daughter as a son. When Valerian’s identity is revealed, you would think
there would be some resentment from his fellow villagers that she was spared, but
it’s only addressed briefly in an exchange with a fellow villager, who seems to
shrug it off. It’s doubtful that other parents who lost daughters, or women who
survived the lottery felt the same way. Our only indication is through Valerian,
who appears conflicted about the choices she had to make, and the consequences.
I also wonder, what would happen if she continued to assume a leadership role
in her male-dominated community? Instead (Spoiler Alert), the writers take the
easy route in the end, as she and Galen set off for greener pastures.
Few would argue that Dragonslayer’s
biggest raison d'être is the eponymous, fire-breathing beast (aka: Vermithrax
Pejorative*). The dragon is appropriately big and scary, but also full of
expression. In a post-modern spin on the evil dragon trope, the film elicits
pathos for a creature that’s past its prime, and lost everything it’s held
dear. The filmmakers deliver the goods, employing every visual trick at their
disposal and creating some new ones for good measure, thanks to Lucasfilm’s
Industrial Light & Magic (ILM) effects team, led by Dennis Muren. Despite
many subsequent advances in effects technology, particularly in CGI, most of
the effects have held up very well. In addition to a full-scale animatronic
creature (built by Brian Johnson at Walt Disney Studios), the filmmakers
utilized 15 other dragon models for various poses. Muren’s team developed an
evolution of stop-motion animation, called Go-Motion, supervised by Phil
Tippett, which relied on a dragon puppet with computer-controlled rods. The
Go-Motion process resulted in an image that contained intentional blurring to
create a more fluid, lifelike action, rather than the jerky movement inherent
in stop-motion animation. (Source: Industrial Light & Magic – The Art of
Special Effects, by Thomas G. Smith)
* Fun Fact #2: According to one source, the dragon’s name means,
roughly translated from Latin, “The Worm of Thrace Who Makes Things Worse."
(source: “The Vermithrax Pejorative Story: Behind the Scenes at the Making of
Dragonslayer,” by M. Ronan, Weird Worlds, 1981)
** Fun Fact #3: 1981 was a competitive year for the Academy
Award in special effects, with Dragonslayer
losing out to another ILM effects project, Raiders
of the Lost Ark.
Dragonslayer is a
pastiche of familiar elements with a flair for spectacle. While the story might
not hold up under intense scrutiny, the film is a good introduction to the
genre, and a solid entry in the glut of early ‘80s sword and sorcery flicks. Paramount
isn’t known for including heaps of DVD extras, but a trailer, “making of”
featurette or commentary track would have been nice. We can only hope that a
decent Blu-ray edition is in the works before too long. At the end of the day, Dragonslayer might be lauded more for
its technical achievements than its originality, but it sure is fun to regress
back to a simpler age, when mythical beasts terrorized the land.
Sword & Sorcery is very far from my favorite genre, but perhaps I should continue to try expanding my cinematic horizon by checking out the films from this month's reviews. 👍
ReplyDeleteAdmittedly, the genre (as a whole) isn't my favorite either, but it does have its highlights. Dragonslayer is one of them. ;)
DeleteA delightfully fun film with an unusual pair of stars, this is one of my favorites from my college years. It gets a lot of unnecessary criticism at times, but I found your review spot on. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the kind words, and for visiting my blog! I had a lot of fun re-visiting this film. It really holds up.
Delete