(1958) Directed by Eugène Lourié; Written by Thelma Schnee;
Based on a story by Willis Goldbeck; Starring: John Baragrey, Mala
Powers, Otto Kruger and Ross Martin;
Available on Blu-ray and DVD
Rating: ***
“…any brain divorced from human experience must become
dehumanized to the point of monstrousness.” – Dr. John Robert Carrington (Robert
Hutton)
I’m not entirely sure when I first watched The Colossus of New York on TV, but it left
a huge impact on my impressionable young mind.
I was fascinated and terrified by images of a lumbering robot with a
human brain, which continued to resonate decades later. Based on my childhood memories, I came to
regard the film as an obscure classic, despite the fact that I was unable to
see it for many years afterward. Thanks
to the film’s recent release on DVD, I was able to experience it again. Knowing that it was impossible to duplicate
the impact that it once had, would still hold up after all these years?
When gifted scientist/inventor Dr. Jeremy Spensser (Ross
Martin of Wild, Wild West fame) dies
in a tragic accident, his father, Dr. William Spensser (Otto Kruger), does what
any grieving parent (okay, maybe not every grieving parent) would do, and endeavors
to keep the brain alive. He enlists the
aid of Jeremy’s brother Henry (John Baragrey) to design a robot body to house the
brain. As Jeremy regains consciousness, he
isn’t too pleased with his new corporeal arrangements. Bereft of the ability to smell, taste or feel,
he’s a prisoner in his artificial body. His
father convinces him to continue his experiments in secret, for the benefit of
humankind. It’s an uneasy arrangement
that works for a time, until Jeremy decides that humanity isn’t worth saving.
Makeup supervisor Wally Westmore’s imposing robotic creation
is the true star of The Colossus of New
York. While it evokes comparison to Paul
Wegener’s Golem and Boris Karloff’s Frankenstein monster, Westmore’s robot is a
truly original piece of work. In fact,
the results are so intimidating that they beg the question why anyone would
want to create an oversized and immensely powerful body for a potentially
unstable brain. Of course, the real
answer is so the robot can go berserk and embark on a rampage through the
streets of Manhattan. Unable to
experience physical love, isolated from his wife and son, and confined to a
small private laboratory (back in the days when every aspiring scientist had one
built into their home), it’s only a matter of time before Jeremy flips his
lid. Thankfully, for the purpose of plot
convenience, he’s equipped with a handy shut-off switch on his side.
Sadly, the human characters in the film are much less
effective. William comes across as
self-righteous, while Henry just seems smug.
Jeremy’s widow Anne (Mala Powers) plays the stereotypical helpless
female protagonist, thwarting Henry’s clumsy advances, while failing to ask the
most basic questions about experiments being conducted right under her nose. Even when she suspects something is awry, she
fails to press the issue, even when William admonishes her not to see her son
Billy in the daytime (conveniently enabling Jeremy to meet with Billy in
secret). The filmmakers seem hell-bent on presenting the Jeremy robot as a
monster, but William is the true antagonist.
(Spoiler Alert) His half-assed little speech at the end of the movie
about the brain not containing a soul ignores the tenderness that Jeremy
displays for his son. His expression of
remorse does little to absolve his poor decisions throughout the film, nor does
he receive the comeuppance his character deserves (usually a 50s sci-fi staple).
Despite the film’s problematic elements, there’s a lot that clicks. Lourié, who worked predominantly as an art
director, imbues an atmospheric, pseudo-gothic feel to the movie. Shots
of the errant robot lurking in the shadows recall German expressionism, and scenes
involving Jeremy walking underwater possess a dreamlike quality. Van Cleave’s subdued piano-based score contributes
to an overwhelming sense of dread. I
also can’t forget the robot’s plaintive, screeching wail, which follows his
initial activation. It’s nothing short
of nightmare fuel.
The Colossus of New
York may not have been the lost classic I had anticipated, but it’s still a
moderately effective take on the Frankenstein
formula. Westmore’s unforgettable
creation and a dark, pervasive atmosphere mostly offset the poor
characterizations and uninspired story. It’s
interesting to note that many of the themes presented in the film (such as
where man ends and machine begins) would be explored thirty years later, albeit
more successfully, with Robocop. Although
The Colossus of New York may not have
followed through with the more provocative issues it raises, it remains a
worthwhile attempt.
No comments:
Post a Comment