(1970) Directed by Roy Ward Baker; Written by Tudor Gates; Adapted
by Harry Fine, Tudor Gates and Michael Fine; Based on the story “Carmilla” by
Sheridan Le Fanu; Starring: Ingrid Pitt, Pippa Steel, Dawn Adams, Madeline
Smith and Peter Cushing; Available on Blu-Ray, DVD and Netflix Streaming.
Rating: ****
“…She has this extraordinary enigmatic quality… I could
always see a sort of tragedy in her eyes as well, as if she doesn’t want to be
a vampire.” – screenwriter Tudor Gates on Ingrid Pitt as Marcilla (from DVD
commentary for The Vampire Lovers)
“It might have been shocking, but it wasn’t dirty… I thought
the things I did in that film were wonderful. I loved it when I had nothing
on.” – Ingrid Pitt on her role as Marcilla (from Hammer Glamour, by Marcus Hearn)
My semi-regular feature The Once Over Twice* is dedicated to
films in my personal collection that slipped through the cracks and never quite
got the respect they deserved. Some of them are a tougher sell than others, but
I hope you’ll find at least a few titles that you like as much as I do. If not,
‘ya can’t blame me for trying. Today’s film du jour is a spicy little number by
Hammer Films, The Vampire Lovers.
* Which gets its name from a song by the seminal L.A. punk
band X. Hey, do I have to explain everything around here?
Film guides tend to discuss The Vampire Lovers more from a standpoint of what it represented,
rather than the movie itself. The film’s release in 1970 marked a transitional
phase. The Hammer brand of horror had carved a niche for itself in the late
‘50s, featuring high production values laced with ample doses of blood and
heaving bosoms. What was once cutting edge a decade ago, however, seemed tame
by the end of the ’60s. By that time, audiences were growing accustomed to more
explicit content, and if Hammer intended to survive into the next decade, the
company needed to keep up with the times. Because The Vampire Lovers ushered in a new era, many critics have chosen a
somewhat condescending stance, acknowledging the film’s craftsmanship, but in
the same breath deriding the more lurid aspects.
The Vampire Lovers
was the first and best of a loose trilogy (all written by Tudor Gates),
frequently referred to as the “Karnstein trilogy.” The disappointing Lust for a Vampire (1971) soon followed,
with the surprisingly good Twins of Evil (1972)
completing the trilogy. Polish-born actress Ingrid Pitt, a virtual unknown, was
selected for the lead in the initial film. At the insistence of co-producer American
International Pictures, Peter Cushing was added, to improve the film’s “bankability.”
Cushing’s small but memorable role as The General adds a level of class to the
proceedings. At the end of the day, however, it’s Pitt who steals the show. Despite
a paltry budget of less than 170,000 pounds, director Roy Ward Baker displayed
Hammer’s typical knack for turning out a quality project, with riveting
performances, sumptuously detailed sets, colorful costumes and a suitably grand
score by Harry Robertson.*
* Just don’t scrutinize things too closely. One brief exterior
shot of an impressive period estate is marred by visible tennis courts in the
background.
At the film’s center is Pitt’s* complex, star-making
performance as the temptress Marcilla (really the undead Carmilla). Men and
women are powerless to resist her formidable charms (No, I didn’t mean it THAT
way. Get your mind out of the gutter.), which she employs to take whatever she
wants. Her haunting, magnetic stare engages the audience from her first entrance.
She’s a contradiction, taking joy in wrapping people around her finger,
contrasted with ruminations of fatalism and despair. The ubiquitous Man in
Black, played by John Forbes-Robertson,** lurks in the background, orchestrating
Marcilla’s movements.
* Pitt, Baker and Gates all contributed to the insightful DVD
commentary. Sadly, all three are no longer with us.
** According to the commentary, Robertson was Hammer’s
back-up for the Dracula films, in
case Christopher Lee was unavailable for the role. He finally got his chance to
play the eponymous count in Hammer’s vampire/kung fu hybrid The Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires.
Madeline Smith is perfect as doe-eyed innocent, Emma Morton,
who succumbs to Marcilla’s spell. Gates and Baker seem to suggest that the
women who fall victim are at least partially complicit in Mircalla’s advances.
In two brief dream sequences, Laura (Pippa Steel), followed by Emma, are
visited by a giant gray cat. Their burgeoning sexuality manifests itself as a
large, feral animal. The filmmakers use the period setting to great effect, to underscore
the repressed atmosphere that prevents both young women from vocalizing their
innermost, sublimated urges.
While the film’s overt lesbian themes and nudity were calculated
to raise eyebrows, Baker and company find just the right tone. Compared to the
excesses from Jesus Franco and Jean Rollin that followed in the early ‘70s, The Vampire Lovers displays commendable
restraint, proving that less is indeed more. Over the years, my opinion of the
film has evolved from guilty pleasure to unabashed fan. The Vampire Lovers is
evocative of a bygone era when it was okay to have crooked yellow teeth
(thanks, Blu-ray), and still be considered sexy. It’s also one of the finest Hammer
vampire films, comparing favorably to the studio’s Dracula films, and even
surpassing many of them.
I've owned this for years and never gotten around to watching it. It was a double feature Midnight Movie paired with Countess Dracula, which I've already watched. You're right about most folks being very dismissive of the Karnstein trilogy. That's probably one of the reasons I've never watched it. I actually really like Brides Of Dracula (1960) and The Legend Of The 7 Golden Vampires (1974), both sans Christopher Lee and often dismissed, so maybe it's time for me to break out this one.
ReplyDeletePut down what you're doing and watch it! :) It's full of signature Hammer atmosphere, and features a great performance by Pitt to boot.
DeleteI'm with you on Brides of Dracula and Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires. Both great fun.
When I wrote my own article, I didn't realize you had written one many years before. It's interesting that our opinions mesh quite well. Clearly, this means we are both 100% correct. :)
ReplyDeleteI think that's a logical conclusion. ;)
Delete