(1963)
Directed by Roger Corman; Written by Robert Dillon and Ray Russell; Story by
Ray Russell; Starring: Ray Milland, Diana Van der Vlis, Harold J. Stone, John
Hoyt and Don Rickles; Available on Blu-ray and DVD
Rating: ****
“I had numerous opportunities to
join the Establishment, and from time to time I did. But I have always stepped
away. Perhaps that is why X has been
called in some circles a serious Corman film – because of an identification
with a scientist who is cursed by his vision and cast out by his community.” –
Roger Corman (excerpt from How I Made a
Hundred Movies in Hollywood and Never Lost a Dime, by Roger Corman, with
Jim Jerome)
“Sam,
we are virtually blind. You tell me that my eyes are perfect. Well, they’re
not. I’m blind to all but a tenth of the universe.” – Dr. James Xavier (Ray
Milland)
X: The Man with
the X-Ray Eyes
is a modern variation of the Icarus myth, about a man who dared to soar too
high and suffered the consequences. Change the characters and setting, but it
remains a tale of hubris and poor foresight. After making a string of films in
the Poe Cycle, producer/director Roger Corman made a conscious decision to explore
new ground, thematically and stylistically. As in the previous Poe films, X was shot in color, adopting a 15-day
shooting schedule, compared to the 10-day schedule for Corman’s black-and-white
productions. Also following the lead of previous releases (starting with The
House of Usher), the film was shown as a single feature, instead of a
double bill. Veteran actor Ray Milland* (Corman’s first choice) starred as Dr.
James Xavier, his second Corman film, after Premature
Burial (1962). X originally ran
with a prologue (included on the Kino Lorber Blu-ray), featuring a rambling montage
about the five senses, and it’s easy to see why it was cut.
*
Fun Fact #1: According to Corman, Milland stated he made two films in his long,
storied career that he was proud of, The Lost Weekend and X.
Dr.
Xavier is conducting research exploring the boundaries of human vision.* He
develops a chemical compound that he hopes will expand the visible frequency
spectrum to the naked eye. When tests on a monkey go poorly, and the subject
dies of shock, he unwisely decides to take things to the next step. Despite the
staunch admonitions of his physician (Harold J. Stone), he uses himself as a
test subject. At first, he’s caught up in the wonder of the situation, as his
eyes have been opened to a new world. Unfortunately for Dr. Xavier, his
colleagues don’t share his enthusiasm, and funding is pulled. He gets into further
hot water when he objects to chief surgeon Willard Benson’s (John Hoyt) diagnosis
of a young heart patient. He takes the matter into his own hands,* performing
the surgery** himself, but proving no good deed goes unpunished, he’s barred
from practicing medicine. Things go from bad to terrible when a well-meaning
colleague attempts to stop him from further self-experimentation, and is
accidentally killed. Xavier is forced to flee, continuing his pursuits covertly.
Fun
Fact #2: When Corman originally conceived of the film, he envisioned the main
character as a sax player in a jazz band who comes upon his X-ray vision
through drugs. He decided to change the musician to a doctor, because the MPAA
would only have approved the former concept if drugs were portrayed in a
strictly negative context.
**
Fun Fact #3: For the surgery scene, Corman used a real-life surgeon as a
stand-in for Milland’s hands.
Corman
and company employed a variety of techniques to depict Xavier’s transformative
visions, shown through POV shots. The effects team used solarization of the
negative and distortion of the final image to create a rainbow effect. As
Xavier continues to see deeper and deeper, he sees skeletons instead of people
and metal framework instead of city buildings (“…a city unborn. Flesh dissolved
in an acid of light. A city of the dead.”). To create the illusion that the main
character was seeing through structures, Corman photographed buildings under different
stages of construction and reversed the order of the film. Although the film’s
layered optical effects didn’t utilize a specific process, they were marketed
by American International Pictures under the umbrella of “Spectarama,”
As
good or crude as any special effects might be, it would be impossible to
adequately depict something that is beyond the spectrum of human perception. As
a result, the burden falls on the actor to convey this expanded vision. Milland
proves to be up to the task, playing Xavier as a tortured man, cursed by his super-human
vision. His anguished expressions communicate a tortured soul, damned to a hell
of his own creation. The greater his vision increases, the more erratic his
behavior becomes. What started out as a quest for truth becomes more like an
addiction.
Don
Rickles, in an early film role, turns in a noteworthy performance as acerbic,
unscrupulous sideshow talker Crane. When Xavier joins a carnival sideshow as “Mentalo,”
the seer, Crane senses that the doctor’s talents are more than an act, and
looks for a way to capitalize on his abilities. For Xavier, it’s an opportunity
to raise needed capital for his experiments, but for Crane, it’s purely
self-serving. When asked what he would do with X-ray vision, Crane comments he
would stare at “all the undressed women my eyes could stand.”
*
Watch for Corman regular Dick Miller as a heckler.
The
basic story, an intrepid scientist delving into mysteries of the universe that
no one was meant to discover, is nothing new. But it’s in the telling that X:
The Man with the X-Ray Eyes rises above typical drive-in shlock (not that
there’s anything wrong with schlock, mind you). With the help of Ray Milland’s committed
performance, the film explores the philosophical and metaphysical implications
of his expanded vision. His quest for truth is a self-destructive journey,
which ultimately becomes what Corman termed a “low budget Greek tragedy.”
I’m
generally not an advocate of remakes, but the material seems ripe for a new
version someday (In his commentary, Corman seemed open to the possibility,
hinting that Warner Brothers might have an option to remake the film), with modern
effects in the service of a good story. This version, however, which relies on
the audience’s imagination and intelligence to fill in the blanks, will be hard
to top.
Sources:
How I Made a Hundred Movies in Hollywood and Never Lost a Dime, by Roger
Corman, with Jim Jerome; Roger Corman Kino Lorber Blu-ray commentary
I have never seen X, but I think I really should.
ReplyDeleteI often debate whether or not I'd take a chance on some future experimental medical procedure if it could restore the sight that has been lost.
While my situation is obviously different from the plot you described, I suspect I may feel a profound connection to this film.
Thanks for illuminating this Corman gem, Barry!
I highly recommend it. I definitely think you'd bring a unique perspective. Let me know if you get a chance to see it!
DeleteExcellent analysis. I really need to see this one again.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much!
DeleteIMHO, this is one of a pair of authentic Roger Corman masterpieces (the other being Masque of the Red Death). It's the ultimate "be careful what you wish for" cautionary tale.
ReplyDeleteGenerally speaking, superhero comics and movies presume that "good" people gifted with great powers can handle them and use them for noble purposes. This film is far more sophisticated. With lines like these, you know this isn't your average drive-in B movie:
"The city, as if it were unborn. Rising into the sky with fingers of metal… limbs without flesh… girders without stone… signs hanging without support… wires dipping and swaying without poles… A city unborn! Flesh dissolved in an acid of light! The city of the dead!"
I love that quote. There's a lot more going on in this film than your usual Saturday matinee fare. I agree that this is one of Corman's masterpieces.
DeleteRumor, forwarded by Stephen King, that Corman cut the last line, "I CAN STILL SEE!" Too harrowing, maybe. But thematically appropriate. And the film does end on an awkward freeze frame...
ReplyDeleteI've heard that as well. I'm not sure if it's true, but it sure fits the tone of the film.
DeleteX is one of my favourite Roger Corman films, and it is one that holds up well. It is still frightening to this day. It is funny that you should mention it being ripe for a remake, as it was something my best friend and I talked about years ago!
ReplyDeleteThanks for visiting, Terence! As you stated, the film holds up well today. Anyone who dared to do a remake would have some big shoes to fill.
DeleteWhat does it say about us that we both chose to use that quote from Rickle's character? :D
ReplyDeleteBy the way, while doing a bit of research for my article, I found a site that claimed to be a tribute site to John C. Howard, the creator of Spectarama started by his grandson. Sadly, the site only contains a single, short introduction.
Wow... I forgot that I used that quote as well. Great minds... ;) That's too bad about Howard. I would like to have learned more about Spectarama.
DeleteFor more information on the Spectarama process, and the artist who created it, visit https://spectarama.com
ReplyDelete