(1984) Directed by Neil Jordan; Written by Angela Carter and
Neil Jordan; Based on a story by Angela Carter; Starring: Sarah Patterson, Angela
Lansbury, David Warner, Stephen Rea and Micha Bergese; Available on Blu-ray, DVD
and Amazon Prime
Rating: ***½
“The one thing we did not want…for it to be logical in a
linear way, which might have caused problems for some people, but I wanted some
surreal elements that kind of come from nowhere, because the story is structured
around a young girl’s dream, and I wanted elements that were as unexpected as
things that happen in a dream; this strange reality that didn’t actually have
to be symbolic of anything…” – Neil Jordan (from DVD commentary)
I’m honored to contribute to the Adoring Angela LansburyBlogathon,
celebrating the marvelously enduring actress and her many contributions to
cinema, stage and TV. Thanks to host Gill Jacob from RealWeegieMidget Reviews
for the invite, and for hosting another exceptional blogathon. The guest of
honor, Ms. Lansbury, reminds us it’s not the screen time that counts, but what
you do with it. Her relatively sparse appearance in The Company of Wolves belies the impact her character has in the
film.
In a thematic shift from his first film, director/co-writer
Neil Jordan’s second directorial effort (working from a story by Angela Carter,
who also co-wrote the screenplay) delves into the realm of fairy tales and
fantasy, steeped in psychosexual imagery. Jordan cited several key influences
for the film, including Grimm’s fairy tales, the artwork of French illustrator Gustave
DorĂ©, German expressionism, and Corman’s “Poe Cycle” of films. Anton Furst’s (Full Metal Jacket, Batman) lush art design and animatronic effects by Christopher
Tucker (The Elephant Man) enhances this
modestly budgeted film.
Jordan described The Company
of Wolves’ story structure as a “Chinese box,” comprised of stories within
stories. Most of the film is set in 18th century rural England, bracketed by a
framing story set in the 20th century. As we enter the alternate dreamlike
fairytale world, a porcelain Granny doll and stuffed animals spring to life.
Our modern-day upper-middle-class protagonist, Rosaleen (Sarah Patterson)
endures rites of passage, and learns about the true nature of men, as relayed
by Granny, now flesh and blood (Angela Lansbury).
We’re introduced to various aspects of fairytale lore, such
as never trusting a man whose eyebrows meet in the middle. Granny admonishes Rosaleen
not to stray from the path, lest she succumb to some unspecified calamity. For
her, the path is the straight and narrow, a virtuous road that’s only becomes
corrupted by wolves and her indiscretion. Shots of frogs throughout the film appear
to signify harbingers of some fantastical transgression. In one scene, Rosaleen
climbs a tree and encounters a nest. Inside the nest she finds bright red
lipstick (evocative of blood and lust) and eggs that hatch to reveal baby dolls
(fertility). The wolves* (a combination of real wolves, dogs and animatronics) featured
throughout the film linger in the shadowy woods, a constant reminder of the
dangers that await her if she dares to venture away from the acceptable route. Eventually,
curiosity prevails over Rosaleen’s fear of her budding sexuality. The film
suggests it’s the natural order of things for adolescents to discover their
sexuality. Part of their rite of passage is to embrace or deny that inherent
aspect of growing up. Despite all admonitions and cautions, it’s a natural, inevitable
process, and a personal journey.
* Not-So-Fun Fact: According to Jordan’s DVD commentary, the
filmmakers originally secured four wolves for the project, but only ended up
with two for the shoot. In one instance, one wolf ate the other.
Angela Lansbury, Jordan explained, brought a duality to the
role of Granny, displaying nurturing and motherly aspects, but also presenting
a darker side. She warns Rosaleen about the hidden dangers of men (“The worst
kind of wolves are hairy on the inside, and when they bite you, they drag you
with them to hell.”). Only Lansbury could make requesting a kiss on the cheek
seem simultaneously innocent and sinister as she spins her cautionary tales. The
stories build to a climactic retelling of the classic Little Red Riding Hood fable.
It should be no surprise concerning Granny’s eventual fate, but it’s handled in
a way that reminds us everything’s in a dream world with its own set of rules
and logic.
Jordan hired a combination of veteran actors and novices for
some key roles. First-timer Sarah Patterson stars as Rosaleen and dancer Micha
Bergese as the Huntsman (a wolf in man’s clothing), was chosen for the physicality
he could bring to the role. The film featured seasoned actors as well,
including David Warner * as Rosaleen’s father, and a fun little cameo by Terence
Stamp as The Devil,** who appears (in an anachronistic, 20th century
turn) in a white Rolls Royce.
* Interesting (but not particularly fun) Fact: David Warner
suffered an accident in which both legs were broken, making it difficult to walk
and stand for long periods of time. As a result, Jordan incorporated many
opportunities for the actor to sit or lean on the set pieces, such as chairs,
tables and a bed.
** Fun Fact: The filmmakers originally wanted Andy Warhol
for the satanic role. Although Warhol was reportedly interested in performing
it, a recent assassination attempt left him afraid of travel, and he insisted
on shooting his part in New York City.
The Company of Wolves
was marketed in the U.S. by Cannon films as a horror movie, rather than the
dark, surrealistic fantasy that it was. Baffled American audiences probably
didn’t know what hit them when they watched it during its theatrical run. The
perceived bait and switch seems to persist to this day, but if you think more Labyrinth and less The Howling, you’ll do fine. Its trancelike properties, purposeful ambiguity
and leisurely pace might put some folks off, but it promises to reward and
challenge on multiple viewings.
Thanks for joining my blogathon. I've always been interested in seeing this movie - but always feared it would be more gorey horror than you've implied. Think I'll have to give it a go now.
ReplyDeleteThanks again for hosting, Gill! There is one particularly graphic transformation scene, but if you can get beyond that, I think you'll appreciate the more dreamlike elements. Well worth seeking out.
DeleteFascinating. I didn't notice this film back in 1984 (I was busy), but now I have time to indulge in movies.
ReplyDeleteIt's a haunting, one-of-a-kind film that I think eluded many viewers' radars the first time around. Thanks for stopping by! :)
DeleteI missed this post, but I'm glad I found it!
ReplyDeleteSaw this years ago and recall enjoying it very much.
Thanks for stopping by, John! I have to admit that I enjoyed watching this film a lot more as an adult than a naive teenager. A lot of the subtext flew over my head at the time. A fascinating film.
Delete