(1986) Directed by Robert Harmon; Written by: Eric Red; Starring:
C. Thomas Howell, Rutger Hauer, and Jennifer Jason Leigh; Available on DVD.
Rating: ***
“…I cut off his legs, and his arms, and his head, and I’m
gonna do the same to you.”
– John Ryder (Rutger
Hauer)
The Hitcher is an
unnerving, perplexing film that vacillates between being an intimate thriller
and an action movie, like Hitchcock filtered through Michael Bay’s lens.
Despite a lukewarm critical and box office reception, the film has gained a
loyal cult following over the years, thanks in no small part to Rutger Hauer’s
chilling performance as the titular character. Set in the dusty American
southwest, The Hitcher focuses on Jim
Halsey (C. Thomas Howell), a young man tasked with a “drive-away,” transporting
a car from Chicago to its owner in San Diego. During a rainy, tedious night, he
decides to pick up a drifter to break up the monotony, which turns out to be a
big mistake. Things escalate quickly, as Jim learns about his passenger’s true intent,
and the cat and mouse games begin.
Hauer’s icy portrayal of the sociopathic Ryder is by far the
best thing about the film. From one minute to the next, you’re never sure what
he’s planning to do. As Ryder taunts Jim with “I want you to stop me,” you get
the feeling he never has less than the upper hand. Every scene with Hauer oozes menace. In one of
the best scenes, he sits in the back of a station wagon, playing with a pair of
kids, while their oblivious parents are up front. Under different circumstances,
the sequence would be innocuous, but given the exchange between Ryder and Jim
in the previous scenes, you know this won’t come to a good end.
Howell does a serviceable (if unremarkable) job as Ryder’s stooge.
Similar to a Hitchcock protagonist, he’s an ordinary man caught up in
extraordinary circumstances, but he’s no James Stewart or Cary Grant. Compared
to his opponent, Jim doesn’t seem particularly bright, as he continues to place
himself in jeopardy and let his guard down. As Ryder outsmarted Jim at every
turn, I wished the film had included a character with more of an edge. One
intriguing thread the film introduces but never follows through with is a
connection that forms between the two, but it’s never fleshed out, thanks to a
few too many high-octane action chase scenes.
Jennifer Jason Leigh does a good job with the hand she’s
dealt as Nash, a likeable but naïve roadside café waitress. Nash is a small
town girl with aspirations for something better, even if she can’t quite articulate
what that something would be. When Jim is framed for murder, she stands up for
him, but the two characters never build much chemistry. Ultimately, Nash isn’t given
much to do except become one of Ryder’s pawns.
Upon its release, The
Hitcher was unfairly taken to task by some critics for being too violent
and sadistic. Although there are a few “gross out” moments, director Robert Harmon
and screenwriter Eric Red demonstrated commendable restraint by keeping most of
the more horrific events off-screen. Ryder’s descriptions of what he did to his
victims create more horrific imagery in the mind’s eye than anything that could
have been depicted on screen.
Where the film falters is its over-reliance on road chase sequences,
with plentiful car crashes and explosions, which only divert the audience from
Ryder and Jim. The Hitcher becomes
the shaggy dog of thrillers, as one situation builds off of the next, making
the film more unbelievable as it progresses. When things get out of hand, it’s hard
to imagine the local authorities wouldn’t have called for assistance from state
police or the FBI. As the body count escalates, logic would dictate he’d put as
much distance between himself and Ryder as possible, instead of checking into a
local motel with Nash.
I would never
profess to put myself in the minds of other viewers, or question their fealty
to The Hitcher, but I wager the first
thing to come to mind would be Hauer’s terrifying portrayal of evil incarnate. Howell
pales by comparison, appearing out of his league when the two actors are
together. The showier, stunt-laden scenes just seem shoehorned into the film to
keep viewers with short attention spans entertained. While The Hitcher falls short of the classic that some would have you
believe, it’s worth checking out for Hauer’s deranged, mesmerizing performance,
and almost makes me want to forgive the film’s trespasses. If you’re looking
for a more successful film about a sociopathic hitchhiker, however, you might
consider Ida Lupino’s 1953 film noir, The
Hitch-Hiker.
time for a re-watch! awesome review, Barry.
ReplyDeleteThanks for visiting! Hauer alone is worth the price of admission.
DeleteI think your interpretation is a bit more profound than the filmmakers intended, but hey, why not? Personally, I can wait another 30 years before watching it again.
ReplyDeleteI actually love this movie, but it's Hauer that makes me love it so much. He's an awesome villain. Cool, clever and mysteriously good looking . It's not an intelligent film, but sometimes all I need is an entertaining movie.
ReplyDeleteHauer is fantastic in this film. I only wish the rest of the movie was up to his standards, but as you mentioned, sometimes we only want to be entertained.
Delete