(1980) Directed by David Lynch; Written by: Christopher De
Vore, Eric Bergren and David Lynch; Based on the books The Elephant Man and Other Reminiscences by Frederick Treves and The Elephant Man: A Study in Human Dignity
by Ashley Montagu; Starring: John Hurt, Anthony Hopkins, Anne Bancroft, John
Gielgud and Freddie Jones
Available on Blu-ray and DVD
Rating: **** ½
“People are frightened by what they don’t understand. And
it’s so hard to understand, even for me, because my mother was so beautiful.” –
John Merrick (John Hurt)
Considering that his only prior feature-length film to date
was Eraserhead, David Lynch seemed an
unlikely choice to helm a major studio production such as The Elephant Man. Perhaps just as odd was the pairing of Lynch with
producer Mel Brooks and his production company, Brooksfilms Limited, to bring the
decidedly grim tale of Joseph Merrick (John Merrick in the film) to the big
screen. While this cooperative venture surely raised an eyebrow or two, the end
result suggests that strange bedfellows could yield exceptional results. In
retrospect, it’s difficult to imagine any other director handling the material
as well, deftly merging art and popular entertainment. The Elephant Man is at once familiar and novel, with its
conventional biopic plot, juxtaposed with the sort of unique surreal flourishes
that one would come to expect from Lynch. While it’s definitely accessible, a
closer examination reveals it’s not so far removed from Lynch’s previous effort.
Both films deal with deformity, isolation and otherness, set amidst an
industrial backdrop
It would be easy to veer on a tangent about what doesn’t
match up between Merrick’s real life versus the character’s reel life, but that
would be missing the point. More relevant, is how The Elephant Man addresses the subject matter. As a work of fiction
based on real people and events, the film encapsulates “civilized” society’s less
than civil response to Merrick’s affliction. Lynch chooses a stylized approach that
favors an expressionistic interpretation over slavish devotion to the details
of Merrick’s life. In the dreamlike opening scene, we catch of glimpse of
Merrick’s alleged origins, as his mother is knocked down by an elephant. Of
course, it’s nothing more than sideshow
ballyhoo, but the scene as presented here is organic to the story, as myth intersects
with reality.
Freddie Francis’ cinematography, shot in gorgeous black and
white, creates the perfect backdrop to tell Merrick’s story. We’re immersed in
a hellish depiction of industrial age England, dominated by shadows and
gaslight. Francis’ lens dwells lovingly on 19th century machinery, filthy
alleyways and a seedy circus sideshow. This inhospitable environment is
accompanied by John Morris’ effective score, which evokes a dark carnival. The
score also introduced many to Samuel Barber’s classical piece, “Adagio for
Strings,” providing an appropriate somber mood. Lynch contributed to the sound
design, transforming Victorian-era London into a living organism, with the clamor
of factories and steam engines coursing through its veins.
Christopher Tucker developed the unforgettable makeup by
studying the real Merrick’s bone structure and death mask. As John Merrick,
John Hurt is unrecognizable beneath the extensive makeup, but his performance
shines through. Born with an incurable, disfiguring disease, Merrick is the
object of scorn and revulsion by greater society, and reduced to slavery as the star attraction in
a traveling freak show. Hurt does a commendable job conveying an individual
whose life is overwhelmed by abject misery. Through eye movement, gestures and
limited speech, he manages to create a portrait of physical and mental pain
that would be unendurable for most. The mere act of sleeping becomes a life or
death struggle, as Merrick must remain propped up by a mountain of pillows to
support the weight of his head.
Anthony Hopkins plays the virtuous (and ambitious) Dr. Frederick
Treves, who rescues Merrick from his abusive handler Bytes (Freddie Jones). Treves
initially takes Merrick’s reticence as a sign of diminished cognitive capacity,
but soon discovers an intelligent, thoughtful human being lying beneath the
horribly distorted exterior. On the other hand, while Treves’ motives seem
superficially noble, the film raises the question whether or not he’s really
much better than Bytes. In the course of moving from the circus to the
hospital, Merrick transitioned from one form of exploitation to another. He’s
simply become fodder for a higher class of gawkers. Although Treves arguably
risked his professional reputation to serve as Merrick’s advocate, he had
everything to gain by his munificence.
It’s easy to see why The
Elephant Man appealed to David Lynch’s sensibilities, with its grotesque
themes, depiction of unfathomable suffering, and struggles for identity. It
represented one of the rare moments in cinema when the material and the artist were
perfectly suited for one another. Despite a conventional narrative, the film
could be called subversive by virtue of the fact that it introduced mainstream
audiences to Lynch and his singular vision. It was unusual enough to attract
the art house crowd, yet engaging enough to appeal to those with less esoteric
tastes. This deeply affecting tale could be called a David Lynch movie for
people who claim they don’t like David Lynch movies (I remember seeing this
with my parents in the theater, so yes, it’s the perfect Lynch film to watch
with your mom). Like all good films, The
Elephant Man taps into some universal truths. It affirms the best and worst
of human nature: the depths that some people will sink to denigrate others who
are different, as well as the heights that others will take to rise above
ignorance and hatred.
No comments:
Post a Comment