“I
am a man of fifty-two years that is still dealing with his first ten years of
existence. I am trying to recuperate from those first ten years.” – Guillermo
del Toro (from 2016 interview by Keith McDonald and Roger Clark, Guillermo
del Toro, At Home with Monsters)
So
many of us spend X amount of dollars and fruitless hours, trying to get back
something they can never regain, watching discs or streaming their favorite
movies and shows from yesteryear. I’m here to tell you, however, that it’s not the
fond memories, but the moments that creep you out that are truly the gift that
keeps on giving. I spent my precious pre-teen years in the ‘70s, cementing my
lifelong love of horror and sci-fi, but of course, you can’t make an omelet without
breaking a few eggs. In a feeble attempt to re-experience the nightmares, I put
each of my top offenders to the test. So, grab your favorite beverage, pull up
a chair, and sit back while I take you on a brief tour of childhood trauma
lane:
Frankenstein
(1931)
One of my earliest memories of watching a horror movie wasn’t in the theater,
but on the small RCA TV in my parents’ bedroom, viewed furtively through my
fingers. Frankenstein’s monster was certainly an imposing spectacle for
five-year-old me, but that wasn’t the half of it. It was Mae Clark’s (playing Dr.
Frankenstein’s bride to be) screams as Boris Karloff’s creature takes her by
surprise, that induced the shivers.
Does
it hold up?
As
a classic of horror cinema, of course. Is it still scary? Not so much. Jack Pierce’s
signature makeup and Boris Karloff’s sympathetic portrayal are a winning
combination for sure, but today the Frankenstein creature seems more worthy of
our pity than revulsion.
Terror
from the Year 5000
(1958) In the dim, cobwebby recesses of my memory, I vaguely recall a horror show
on KTLA in the early ‘70s, Monster Rally, hosted by Seymour (Larry
Vincent) that was my oldest brother’s favorite. I only remember bits and pieces
of the show, since I was usually asleep by the time it came on. One fateful
evening, I popped out just in time to watch a scene in which a man in a lab
coat was puttering around in a laboratory. He adjusted a dial on some beeping
equipment, watching a tall, windowed chamber, while delving into mysteries we
weren’t supposed to know (you know the drill). Something goes wrong, and a screeching
lady bursts out of the chamber, embarking on a one-woman rampage.
Does
it hold up?
Are
you kidding? Looking at the scene now, it’s tough to get in the head of my younger
self. Clad in a sequined unitard, the object of my childhood fright looks more
like an escapee from a second-rate Vegas act than a fugitive from the future. Once
again, it was probably the screeching, more than anything, that set me off (Hmm…
I see a pattern emerging). The movie was later mocked on Mystery Science
Theater 3000, which makes me a bit sad, because for little old me, Terror
from the Year 5000 was pure terror in the suburban family room. Note:
Getting a good quality screen shot from this movie is about as likely as
getting a decent shot of bigfoot (Hence, the cryptid-quality pic that you see
above. Let your mind fill in the blanks.).
Live
and Let Die
(1973) My earliest movie theater memory involved the drive-in, watching Roger
Moore’s debut as Agent 007. Of all the bewildering sights and sounds in the
film, the sequence that stood out was Baron Samedi’s (Geoffrey Holder) voodoo
ritual, with his maniacal laugh and skull-like visage. I watched him (or more
accurately, his simulacrum) rise out of the graveyard, only to witness James
Bond shoot him in the head, blowing off half his skull, and watching the eyes
roll back. I couldn’t distinguish between the fake Baron Samedi and the one
played by Holder. I couldn’t process what I thought I saw, although it didn’t
seem to affect Samedi, who appeared in subsequent scenes.
Does
it hold up?
It’s
still kind of a weird scene, but it doesn’t have the same effect. I can
understand why the whole switch-and-bait thing with real versus fake Samedi
would be confusing to my developing five-year-old mind, but scary? Not really.
You gotta love Holder’s hearty laugh, though.
Jaws (1975) I still
have vivid memories of seeing this at the dear departed Van Nuys drive-in. I
got my first shock in the opening scene, where Chrissie’s (Susan Backlinie)
moonlight skinny dip takes an unexpectedly fatal turn. The biggest fright,
however, was reserved for later, when Matt Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss) discovers Ben
Gardner’s head bobbing up through a hole in his submerged fishing boat.
Does
it hold up?
Damn
right. The Ben Gardner jump scare has become a one-trick pony with multiple
viewings. In contrast, the visceral opening scene still haunts me. Quint’s
(Robert Shaw) speech about the Indianapolis probably sounded like “blah, blah,
blah” to seven-year-old me. Now, it chills me to the bone, as a sobering reminder
that it’s not what you see, but what you don’t see, that frightens the most.
Coma (1978) By the
latter part of the ‘70s, my (significantly) older brothers were already in
college, doing their own thing. This left my parents without someone to watch
me (a babysitter would have been out of the question, in their minds). Invariably,
I saw quite a few movies in the theater that I probably wasn’t prepared to see
(Coming Home, from the same year springs to mind, but that’s for another
time and another discussion). A few scenes that freaked me out involved medical
procedures, partially dissected corpses, organ harvesting, partially nude coma
patients hanging on wires, and watching someone smothered by an avalanche of
cadavers – heavy stuff for any 10-year-old (mind you, this was PG).
Does
it hold up?
Decades
after my initial viewing, the film holds up surprisingly well. Director Michael
Crichton (working from a novel by Robin Cook) crafted a pretty solid medical
thriller, filled with intrigue and shocks aplenty. The scene where Geneviève
Bujold’s would-be assassin get buried under a pile of cadavers is still
unsettling. Thanks to this film, what really sticks with me are the existential
fears of going into surgery, and not knowing if you’ll wake up. And with
increasing population and rising medical expenses partnered with corporate
greed, the idea of a large-scale organ-harvesting operation doesn’t seem so
far-fetched.
Alien
(1979)
With multiple sequels, prequels and crossovers, it’s hard to imagine that when
the first movie came out, there wasn’t anything else quite like Alien. Swiss
surrealist H.R. Giger’s otherworldly biomechanical designs were like nothing
else I had seen before. I cringed at the scene where Kane (John Hurt) unwisely
peered into an activated alien egg, followed by his famous demise in a later
sequence. Thinking about the creature in its final form, with its vaguely
insectile, skeletal appearance, kept me awake at night, wondering what was
lurking in the shadows, waiting to grab me.
Does
it hold up?
Hell
yes! The original remains creepiest. Giger’s artwork, steeped in phallic and
yonic imagery, has stood the test of time. Ridley Scott’s film hits all the
right notes, and no quantity of inferior sequels (Aliens excluded) nor
attempts to explain away the origin of the creatures can diminish the impact of
the initial film.
SIDE
NOTE: The last three examples feature William Shatner. What is it about Shatner
that merits his appearance three times in this piece (in all fairness, the first
scene of the three I reference only has Shatner in a peripheral)? I honestly
can’t say. Perhaps someone can help me analyze my deep-seated trepidation that
comes with Shatner’s screams. I’ve never found Shatner himself particularly
frightening, although his face indirectly contributed to the creation of the
Michael Meyers mask, so there’s that.
Star
Trek: The Motion Picture (1979) Yes, you read that right. Star Trek: The
Motion Freaking Picture. The first film, based on the original TV series has
a reputation for being visually spectacular, having an unforgettable Jerry
Goldsmith score, and (at least to some) being kind of dull. There is, however,
one scene that disturbed me to the core. While the recently refurbished starship
Enterprise is being rushed back into service, the transporter malfunctions, killing
two crewmembers. We only see indistinct, distorted images in the transporter
room, but the thing that got me the most were the weird, high-pitched screams.
When Admiral Kirk asks about the status of the poor crewmembers, he’s told, “What
we got back didn’t live very long.” My mind was left to fill in the sordid
details – all this from a G-rated film (thank you 1970s MPAA).
Does
it hold up?
Say
what you want about the movie’s languid pace or derivative storyline, the film still
has its virtues (watch for a future review). And 40 years later, the transporter
accident scene hasn’t lost its power to unnerve me. The idea that a device
could tear someone apart on the atomic level and (hopefully) re-assemble the
pieces, a sort of death and re-birth, never fails to give me the creeps.
The
Outer Limits,
“Cold Hands, Warm Heart” (1964) Yes, everyone seems to mention “The Zanti
Misfits” as their nightmare-fodder of choice, but for me, it was the episode
“Cold Hands, Warm Heart.” Shatner plays Col. Jeff Barton, an astronaut who just
returned from a perilous one-man journey to Venus. He encounters a terrifying
event while descending into the planet’s atmosphere, with a hideous creature reaching
out to him.
Does
it hold up?
Well…
I can appreciate the results, keeping in mind the show’s low budget, coupled
with pressure to deliver a new monster every week. On the other hand, what
freaked me out as a kid, an obvious puppet on strings, doesn’t quite have the
same impact now. Something that occurred to me while revisiting the episode
after several decades, was how this was a thinly veiled exploration of PTSD, its
effects on the traumatized individual, and the impact on the people around them.
Outside of Barton’s puzzled wife, he had a conspicuous lack of a support
network. Hey, if that isn’t scary, I don’t know what is.
Star
Trek,
“The Man Trap” (1966) A hideous creature that drains the salt from people’s
bodies attacks Captain Kirk (once again, it’s something about his agonized
cries that sold it). The alien monster was the stuff of nightmares to my young
eyes, looking something like an overly hirsute Morlock, with dead eyes and oversized
sucker hands.
Does
it hold up?
My
recollection of the episode, obscured by a fog of muddy memories, led me to
believe that the salt monster had a lot more screen time than it actually does.
It’s only briefly seen at the end, since it spends most of the film disguised
as one human or another. It remains one of the original series’ most effective
creatures, although I can’t help but feel sad for it, as the last of its kind.
Great post. It is funny the things that affect us over time. The earliest horror memory I have is the bleeding cellar wall in The Amityville Horror. Pure terror! And I was like 8!
ReplyDeleteThank you! I can see how that would've made a big impact!
DeleteWell, Barry...we have a shared cinematic psychological trauma. Well, a few, but I gotta say Star Trek: The Motion Picture had me severely unsettled. Just like you, that transporter malfunction haunted me, and you are right. It is still creepy, especially because of what we don't see.
ReplyDeleteI can't wait for your review! I rewatched it just last month and I agree. It has a lot of virtues.
I'm glad I'm not alone regarding that scene. Pure childhood trauma!
DeleteI'm still trying to figure out what will go where (and when) next year, but I'll probably cover Star Trek: The Motion Picture sooner rather than later.
I always thought the best Frankenstein movies, like the original novel, were more tragedies than horror. It does not mean they do not have serious spooky scenes.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. As I got older, I focused more on the sadness of the creature, rather than the creature's actions. He was unwillingly brought into a world he didn't understand.
DeleteGreat post! I love these childhood recollections of horror movies. It brings home why it is we love these films so much.
ReplyDeleteThank you! I had fun writing this post. Glad you enjoyed it! :)
Delete