(1998) Directed by Alex Proyas; Written by Alex Proyas, Lem
Dobbs and David Goyer; Starring: Rufus Sewell, Kiefer Sutherland, Jennifer
Connelly, William Hurt, Richard O’Brien and Ian Richardson; Available on Blu-ray
and DVD
Rating: ****
“The original idea came from me wanting to, I guess, combine
a hard-boiled detective with the science fiction genre, and out of my desire to
create a film involving these two very opposed styles of film.” – Alex Proyas
“The Strangers represent, I suppose, what we could become if
we lost our souls.” – David Goyer
Due to Dark City’s central
conceit, it’s difficult to discuss the film without revealing some key plot points.
If you haven’t seen the movie and want to remain spoiler free, you might want
to revisit this review at a later date. Otherwise, let’s jump in…
Director/co-writer Alex Proyas’ ambitious follow-up to The Crow, covers similar gothic
territory, but covers a larger scope: the fate of an entire population. This sci-fi
noir takes place in a metropolis trapped in perennial night. Proyas and
production designer Patrick Tatopoulos (with George Liddle) borrowed from
several decades for the film’s signature look, although the 1930s-1940s
aesthetic prevails. Shot in Australia over a period of 80 days on 55 sets, Dark City immerses us in a world that
appears at once alien and familiar,* recalling an old-time Northeastern
American city from our collective memories.
* One of the film’s touches is its depiction of an automat, modeled
after the ubiquitous Horn & Hardart eating establishments, which were a ubiquitous part of New York and
Philadelphia’s early 20th century urban landscape.
The film begins with a mystery, as John Murdoch (Rufus
Sewell) wakes up in a bathtub, confused about who he is, and what he‘s doing in
a strange hotel room. He attempts to piece together his hazy memories by looking
for clues in the city, and discovers he’s wanted for the killing of several
prostitutes. Although he has no recollection of the murders, he vaguely recalls
being estranged from his wife Emma (Jennifer Connelly), who recently had an
affair with another man, and a childhood spent in Shell Beach. Sewell was
chosen by Proyas because the director felt Murdoch’s quest for identity would
be more believable if the audience wasn’t accustomed to the actor. Sewell is
appealing as our guide to this inhospitable city, conveying the right blend of naiveté
and irritation about his predicament. We share his surprise as he uncovers his
latent abilities to “tune,” or re-arrange matter at will. We also share his frustration,
as he tries to uncover the truth behind the city, and his quest for the elusive
Shell Beach.
The black-clad Strangers are the hive-minded puppet masters
who orchestrate the city’s activities. Their bodies are mere vessels for the
alien creatures that reside within. They reside in a vast underground complex,
deep below the city, where they master time and matter through psychic-controlled
machinery. They continually shuffle the city, people and memories in new
combinations, in an effort to uncover the mysteries of the human soul. Richard
O’Brien stands out as the Stranger, Mr. Hand, who shares Murdoch’s memories and
tracks his movements. His sociopathic demeanor belies his keen fascination with
the human species and the value of individuality. Ian Richardson and Bruce
Spence are also memorable as Strangers Mr. Book and Mr. Wall.
Kiefer Sutherland plays against type as the sniveling
psychiatrist Dr. Schreber, who assists the Strangers with their insidious human
experiments. He creates and implants new memories in the city’s residents,
observing the individual differences and the resulting interactions when roles
are reversed. Schreber fashions custom mixtures of memories and emotions, like
mixing pigments on a canvas to create new colors, injecting the resultant biochemical
cocktail into the unwilling recipients’ frontal lobes.* His betrayal of
humanity stems more from self-preservation than malice, as he lives in constant
fear of retaliation by the alien overlords. But we sense he’s just biding his
time until he can find a way to turn against them. Schreber spends his spare
time in a swimming pool, a passive-aggressive statement against his aquaphobic
captors.
* Current research suggests long-term memories are primarilystored in the brain’s pre-frontal cortex,
although pre-fabricated memories in a syringe might be stretching things a wee
bit.
The spiral shape recurs throughout the film, signifying an
inexorable pathway, like a rat following Dr. Schreber’s maze. In one shot, the
city itself is revealed to be a spiral shape, reinforcing the metaphor. Former
policeman Walenski (Colin Friels) draws the spirals with an
obsessive-compulsive fervor. His madness masks the fact that he’s discovered
the truth about the city and its inhabitants, with everyone following a
pre-determined path. Inevitability might also describe the relationship between
Murdoch and Emma. She can’t accept her husband’s assessment that their marriage
(and by extension, her betrayal), was nothing but a fabrication, suggesting
their bond transcends any pre-programmed roles.
Visually, Dark City
is a masterpiece, but as a movie about celebrating humanity it leaves me
feeling somewhat cold and distanced from the characters. But it’s a wonderful
exercise in style as substance (as opposed to style over substance), and the
images have remained embossed in my brain. Detailed sets, miniature models and
CGI are blended judiciously to create a city that’s constantly being
constructed and de-constructed. The only effects that fall short are the computer-rendered
creatures that reside within the Strangers, which are only briefly seen.
Dark City invites
frequent comparisons to such dystopian films as Blade Runner and Metropolis
(I would also throw in Gotham City from Tim Burton’s Batman), with elements such as invented memories and towering
skylines. Screenwriter Lem Dobbs, however, cited the works of George Orwell as
one of his primary influences. Whatever the inspirations, conscious or
subconscious, the end result is far from derivative. Most similarities are superficial,
relying partially on our collective memories of earlier films to make an
association. Dark City demands our
attention, and is open to multiple interpretations. The fact that it didn’t thrive
at the box office suggests 1998 audiences wanted less challenging fare. Oddly
enough, many of the same existential themes of reality and identity were
explored, perhaps in a flashier package, in the following year’s hit, The Matrix. Regardless of its initial
reception, Dark City has earned a
loyal following, and is worthy of reassessment. Alex Proyas’ best effort to
date proves his mettle as a true visionary, despite some of the career misfires
that followed. It would be nice to see him eventually return to such territory.
No comments:
Post a Comment