(1979) Written and directed by: Werner Herzog; Based on the
novel Dracula, by Bram Stoker;
Starring: Klaus Kinski, Isabelle Adjani and Bruno Ganz;
Available on Blu-ray and DVD
Rating: ****
“Death is a cruelty against the unsuspecting. But that’s not what I perceive as cruel. Cruel is when you can’t die even if you want
to.” – Count Dracula (Klaus Kinski)
A remake of F.W. Murnau’s groundbreaking horror classic Nosferatu would seem like a fool’s
errand in less capable hands, but Writer/director Werner Herzog pulls off the
impossible. More than an homage or update,
Herzog returned to Henrik Galeen’s original script and Bram Stoker’s novel to create
his screenplay. While the original version
of Nosferatu was an unauthorized
telling of Bram Stoker’s novel Dracula,
with the names changed to distance itself from the source material,* Herzog
used the original names from Stoker’s story.
The end result is something at once familiar and different from any
other incarnation of the Dracula story.**
* Despite their efforts to conceal their film’s origin, the
makers of Nosferatu were sued by
Stoker’s widow, and a German court ordered existing prints of Nosferatu destroyed. Thankfully for Herzog and future generations,
some copies survived.
** In his DVD commentary, Herzog claimed not to have seen
the Bela Lugosi version.
Herzog cast volatile actor Klaus Kinksi* as Count Dracula, an
inspired but controversial choice. While
Herzog had “no doubt” about his decision to cast Kinski in the role, he had to
justify his choice to a crew accustomed to the actor’s well-earned reputation
for on-set tirades. Kinski is perfect as
the tormented count. More than a simple
mimicry of Max Schreck’s Count Orlok, Kinski paints a canvas of despair,
depicting Dracula as a pathetic, lonely creature, distanced from the world of
the living. In his initial meeting with
solicitor Jonathan Harker (Bruno Ganz), he laments how he’s lived for
centuries, but never really lived. He watches
Harker devour his meal with longing and fascination. Sentenced to an eternity of pain and solitude,
he must repeat the same cursed existence over and over. Kinski’s Dracula is the antithesis of the
romantic creatures that have dominated most vampire films in recent memory. He’s become something neither man nor beast, a
slave to his baser impulses. When Harker
cuts his finger, Dracula lunges at the bleeding appendage with an unstoppable fervor.
* Although Herzog and Kinski collaborated on several films
together, their working arrangement was ambivalent at best. Anyone interested in learning more about the
director’s often contentious relationship with Kinski should check out the
immensely entertaining (Herzog) documentary, My Best Fiend.
Isabelle Adjani stuns as Jonathan Harker’s wife Lucy. She appears almost ethereal in her scenes, as
a paragon of untarnished beauty and virtue.
As Harker descends into darkness under the influence of Dracula, she
assumes the heroic stance to protect the man she loves. She seems to be the only one willing or able
to stand up to the Count, after he moves into their village with the plague in
tow. By contrast, the frail Dr. Van
Helsing (Walter Ladengast) appears impotent in the face of evil, even as death
surrounds him. French actor/artist
Roland Topor* is also memorable, in his off-the- rails performance as Dracula’s
crazed servant Renfield.
* Fun Fact: Topor’s psychedelic artwork formed the basis for
the alien world depicted in René Laloux’s animated film Fantastic Planet.
Shot for an estimated $896,000 with a minimal crew, Nosferatu looks like a more expensive
production,* thanks to Herzog’s insistence to film on location, rather than
sets. The seven-week shoot took place
primarily in Holland, which stood in for the German port town of Wismar, and
Eastern Slovakia, for Transylvania. Dracula’s
home was a castle in Moravia. Instead of
employing professionals, Herzog employed many non-actors for supporting roles,
including an entire village of gypsies.
The scenes with Harker and the gypsies take on a documentary-style
appearance, and their presence lends a certain veracity that could not be
conveyed by regular actors.
* At the behest of American distributor Fox, Herzog simultaneously
filmed an English-language version with the same crew, although it’s the
German-language version that most film fans prefer.
Herzog does away with special effects or other post-production
trickery to tell his vampire story, relying on a more straightforward
approach. Jörg Schmidt-Reitwein’s
striking cinematography sets the mood for Nosferatu,
with images of a foggy desolate beach, rats swarming off a sailing ship, and
Harker wandering the shadowy cobwebbed halls of Dracula’s castle. In one overhead shot, we witness multiple
pallbearers and coffins snaking through the streets of Wismar like icy tendrils
of death. In another scene, absurdity
and hysteria prevail as some plague-infected residents (played by the film
crew) enjoy a brief moment of revelry.
Frequent Herzog collaborator Popol Vuh contributes the dynamic,
haunting music score. A funereal chorus presides over the opening shot inside a
crypt.* The audience is then introduced
to the peaceful town of Wismar, underscored by placid, guitar-infused music. The tone rapidly shifts to more ominous
sounds as Harker travels to Transylvania, and a return to the plaintive chorus. Wagner is heard, as Harker traverses unknown territory,
crossing foreboding landscapes and mist-shrouded mountains.
* In another nod to realism versus artificiality, this
particular scene was filmed in a mausoleum in Mexico, and featured real
mummified corpses.
Herzog’s film is a perfect companion piece (a B-side, if you
will) to Murnau’s original.
His poetic vision of Nosferatu
compares favorably to, and in terms of character development, even surpasses
the original. It’s deliberately paced, which
in most instances could be a fancy way of saying that it’s slow, but that’s not
really the case here. Herzog lets his
story unfold in its own time. Uninterested in cheap thrills and special
effects, he chooses to ruminate on existence and dwell on the nature of evil. (SPOILER
ALERT) The bleak ending takes a post-modern
spin on the traditional conceit that evil was always held at bay by the
virtuous and righteous. Herzog gives no quarter,
instead, leaving us with the unsettling conclusion that love, no matter how
strong, does not conquer all.
Wonderful post, Barry. I've not watched this in many years. I remember having the novelization of this version, which had that gorgeous poster image on the cover.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Brandon. It was great watching both versions back to back, and seeing how Herzog honored the original while taking his version in a new direction.
DeleteThe poster really capsulizes the feel of the movie, dreamlike and hypnotic.
My son and I watched the original last fall on the big screen with a live band. It was very cool. I may do a double feature like you suggested once I get the blu ray of Herzog's film. Great review and cool post, Barry!
ReplyDeleteThat must have been incredible. You and and your son were very lucky to see such a screening. I'm green with envy!
DeleteLike you, I've made a conscious effort to introduce my son and daughter to movies from another age. It's good for them to know that films existed more than 10 years ago. :)
Thanks for the kind words!